The use of lead piping in plumbing systems can be traced back over 2,000 years. Romans used lead and clay piping to supply potable water to private homes, amphitheaters, and bathhouses and lead continued to be the material of choice for water supply lines until WW2. Upon the discovery that lead was leaching out of the pipes’ material, contaminating the water and causing lead poisoning, it ceased to be used as a material for water supply lines and was replaced with copper and galvanized steel. Galvanized steel was also retired not long after, due to issues with rust and corrosion, and copper became the material of choice. Copper is easy to work with, it comes in soft (annealed) and hard forms, and for many years it was considered the gold standard for water supply lines.
It has been estimated that in 2018 the annual world production of copper tubing used in water distribution systems was approximately 500 million kilograms (or 500,000 tons), which is equivalent to about 1.25 million km of pipe (enough to wrap around the Earth’s Equatorial circumference 31 times!).
In recent times, various polymeric materials, especially flexible PEX, have slowly begun to replace copper as the material of choice for water supply lines. Their low cost and ease of installation being too advantageous to ignore despite copper having a longer lifespan. Still, copper has its place in the industry, and it will continue to be used in water-carrying pipes for many years to come.
Copper tubing comes in four types based on the pipe wall thickness relative to the diameter of the pipe; K, L, M, and DWV (drain-waste-vent). Type K has the largest wall thickness to pipe diameter ratio, and it is usually used for applications where extreme strength is needed. The DWV type has the lowest wall thickness to pipe diameter ratio, making it suitable only for drain and vent lines as it cannot withstand the water pressure of most municipal water supply systems. Copper types L and M are the pipes most often used for standard pressurized water supply pipes.
Copper tubing can be connected in several ways: sweat-soldering, brazing, compression fittings, and push-in-style fittings (e.g., Shark Bite).
While most experts agree that copper is the best available material for water-carrying pipes, copper pipes and copper pipe connections still regularly fail, and will continue to fail in service, causing extensive property damage and expensive insurance claims. Investigating copper pipe/connection failures can be an extensive and complex process. The most common causes for copper pipe/connection failures seem to be associated with installation deficiencies and freezing. However, there are many more failure modes and causes which will be presented below.
Installation Deficiencies
Photograph 1: Substandard solder connection exhibiting shallow depth of the joint.
Photograph 2: Substandard solder connection with no solder on the contact surfaces creating a snug-fir connection.
Photograph 3: Substandard soldered joint exhibiting improper surface preparation and excessive solder beading.
Photograph 4: Copper pipe in direct physical contact with aluminum framing causing galvanic corrosion. In this example, it was the frame that corroded.
Photograph 5: Copper riser that was bent in service and which developed a longitudinal split. Stresses induced in the pipe due to bending contributed to the formation of the split.
Photograph 6: DWV (drain-waste-vent) fitting improperly used in a riser where it was subjected to pressure for which it was not designed for.
Freezing
One of the leading causes of copper/fitting failure in service is freezing. Freezing can occur for many reasons and in various scenarios. When freezing occurs in a copper plumbing system, either a longitudinal split forms in the pipe, usually in an elbow section (as shown in photograph 7), or at a poorly soldered joint. The split in the pipe exhibits typical characteristics like a fish-mouth appearance and outward bulging around the rim. Although the split and macro features can be seen by the naked eye, sometimes further microscopic examination is required to determine whether there was a manufacturing defect within the material. Soldered joints forcefully separated by freezing can be distinguished by the presence of longitudinal markings on the separated contact surfaces.
Photograph 7: Split with fish mouth appearance in a 900 copper elbow which was typical for failure due to freezing. The piping was installed in non-heated attic space and it was not protected from freezing.
Stress Corrosion Cracking
Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is a progressive degradation mechanism that occurs in metals and alloys as a result of the simultaneous presence of tensile stress, a corrosive environment, and a susceptible material. In the absence of one of these three components, SCC will simply not occur. Failures due to SCC can be very unpredictable. They can occur after as little as a few hours of exposure. Conversely, the piping may continue to function normally for months or even years. SCC of copper pipes is often encountered in risers associated with HVAC systems in high-rise apartment buildings and a full metallurgical evaluation is required to reach a definite conclusion. There will be secondary and branched cracks in the material (as seen in photograph 8) and the fracture surface will be either transgranular (through the grains), or intergranular (along the grain boundaries, as seen in photograph 9).
Photograph 8: Microstructure of a metallographic sample from copper pipe showing secondary branched cracks, typical for stress corrosion cracking degradation mechanism.
Photograph 9: Fracture surface of a SCC degraded copper pipe as seen under a powerful microscope (magnification x500). The fracture is intergranular as it developed along the grain boundaries.
Service Conditions
Photograph 10: Stereo microscope image of the inner surface of a copper tube affected by erosion-corrosion. Scooped appearance in areas where the pipe material was eroded and swept away.
Photograph 11: Optical microscope image of pitting on the internal surface and wall perforation of a copper pipe due to addition of undesirable chemicals in chlorinated water (magnification x50).
Stray current corrosion
Stray current is an electrical current that flows through paths outside the intended electrical circuit. It creates an electrical potential between two metallic components that should not be subjected to voltage. It can be caused by wiring flaws (electrical equipment not properly grounded), or underground metallic structures close to piping. Corrosion is an electrochemical process involving an anode (a piece of metal that readily gives up electrons; corrodes), an electrolyte (a conductive media that helps electrons move) and a cathode (a piece of metal that readily accepts electrons). In stray current corrosion, the piping becomes the anode and will therefore corrode over time. Damage caused by stray current corrosion is usually localized, and it can be identified by the presence of rounded crater-like features on the surface which eventually grow, overlap, and cause wall perforations. Photograph 12 illustrates a section of a copper pipe that was consumed by stray current corrosion.
Photograph 12: Copper piping that failed as the result of stray current corrosion because of improper grounding of electrical appliances.
Intentional damage (insurance fraud)
I have seen many instances where attempts were made to deceive insurance companies for financial gain. This has included piping/fittings intentionally altered and submitted as a claim, posing as an installation issue or a manufacturing defect that caused the incident. One example is the pipe section illustrated in photograph 13. The homeowner used a pipe cutter to make a partial circumferential cut on the copper pipe. Being weakened by this process, it was only a matter of time before the split opened, creating the pathway for water to discharge. The claim was eventually denied, but not before a comprehensive fractography analysis under a powerful microscope and metallurgical evaluation were conducted to rule out an installation issue, overpressure, or a manufacturing defect.
Photograph 13: Copper pipe cut intentionally using a pipe cutter.
Manufacturing deficiencies
Manufacturing defects, such as voids, pores, impurities, and non-uniform microstructure, all of which reduce the load-carrying capability of the pipe, will act as undesirable stress concentrators. Such defects can be identified only by destructive examination and metallurgical evaluation of microstructures. A metal/alloy microstructure is the result of the material chemical composition and processing history, and it will dictate the final properties of the material and/or the component manufactured from the material. There are specific heat treatments for each family of alloys to tailor the microstructures to the desired level. Smaller grains are desired as this condition will increase the strength of the material while a large grain microstructure will have a detrimental effect on the strength and toughness of the material. Although the grain size is controlled at the manufacturing stage, sometimes variations from the desired microstructure are encountered, such as the example illustrated in photograph 14.
Photograph 14: Microstructure of a copper pipe metallographic sample exhibiting excessive grains growth with a detrimental effect on the strength and toughness (magnification x100). Photo courtesy of M. Lazarek
Dinu Matei, Consulting Forensic Engineer M.Sc., P.Eng.
Dinu specializes in metallurgical, materials and mechanical failure analysis. During the course of his career, he has been involved in more than 700 failure investigations of various metallic and non-metallic components, and in 23 projects leading to the development of new materials and processes.